Fill the details/instructions form and checkout for your essay - pro writers; top college graduates only in less than 5 mins, NO AI—Plagiarism-free!.
Posted: December 11th, 2024
Click the link above to submit your assignment.
Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights
Research, review and analyze Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F.Supp. 63 (D.Mass. 1989). Based on your research and the case, write a 5-6 page paper in which you:
1. Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):
· Facts of the case
· Issues
· Rule
2. Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech.
3. Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.
4. Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.
5. Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
6. Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
7. Provide at least four (4) additional court cases that support your analysis.
Your assignment must:
· Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Recommend how the legal system addresses critical issues faced by public officials to include freedom of the press, funding of government contracts, separation of church and state, public ethics law, hiring lawyers, and handling civil litigation.
· Write a word essay – Evaluate legal subjects relevant to public administration to include property, government contracts, employment, and torts.
· Relate the administrative process, constitutional and statutory requirements, to the scope of judicial review of administrative agency decisions.
· Assess legal decisions related to the administration of public goods.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues in constitution and administrative law.
· Write clearly and concisely about issues in constitution and administrative law using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here.
Rubric:
Name: PAD525 Week 7 Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights
Description: PAD525 Week 7 Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights
· Grid View
· List View
Unacceptable Below 70% F
Fair 70-79% C
Proficient 80-89% B
Exemplary 90-100% A
PAD525-A3-1
1. Analyze and evaluate case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Weight: 12%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 31.04 (8.39%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points Range:31.08 (8.4%) – 35.48 (9.59%)
Partially analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points Range:35.52 (9.6%) – 39.92 (10.79%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points Range:39.96 (10.8%) – 44.4 (12%)
Thoroughly analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
PAD525-A3-2
2. Analyze and evaluate case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Weight: 12%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 31.04 (8.39%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points Range:31.08 (8.4%) – 35.48 (9.59%)
Partially analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points Range:35.52 (9.6%) – 39.92 (10.79%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Points Range:39.96 (10.8%) – 44.4 (12%)
Thoroughly analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
PAD525-A3-3
3. Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech. Weight: 12%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 31.04 (8.39%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech.
Points Range:31.08 (8.4%) – 35.48 (9.59%)
Partially analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech.
Points Range:35.52 (9.6%) – 39.92 (10.79%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech.
Points Range:39.96 (10.8%) – 44.4 (12%)
Thoroughly analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech.
PAD525-A3-4
4. Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information. Weight: 12%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 31.04 (8.39%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information.
Points Range:31.08 (8.4%) – 35.48 (9.59%)
Partially analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information.
Points Range:35.52 (9.6%) – 39.92 (10.79%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information.
Points Range:39.96 (10.8%) – 44.4 (12%)
Thoroughly analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information.
PAD525-A3-5
5. Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law. Weight: 12%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 31.04 (8.39%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law.
Points Range:31.08 (8.4%) – 35.48 (9.59%)
Partially analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law.
Points Range:35.52 (9.6%) – 39.92 (10.79%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law.
Points Range:39.96 (10.8%) – 44.4 (12%)
Thoroughly analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law.
PAD525-A3-6
6. Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense. Weight: 13%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 33.63 (9.09%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
Points Range:33.67 (9.1%) – 38.44 (10.39%)
Partially analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
Points Range:38.48 (10.4%) – 43.25 (11.69%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
Points Range:43.29 (11.7%) – 48.1 (13%)
Thoroughly analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
PAD525-A3-7
7. Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case. Weight: 12%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 31.04 (8.39%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
Points Range:31.08 (8.4%) – 35.48 (9.59%)
Partially analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
Points Range:35.52 (9.6%) – 39.92 (10.79%)
Satisfactorily analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
Points Range:39.96 (10.8%) – 44.4 (12%)
Thoroughly analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
PAD525-A3-8
8. Clarity and writing mechanics Weight: 10%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 25.86 (6.99%)
More than 6 errors present
Points Range:25.9 (7%) – 29.56 (7.99%)
5-6 errors present
Points Range:29.6 (8%) – 33.26 (8.99%)
3-4 errors present
Points Range:33.3 (9%) – 37 (10%)
0-2 errors present
PAD525-A3-9
9. Research and cite at least four (4) court cases that support the analysis. Weight: 5%
Points Range:0 (0%) – 12.91 (3.49%)
Researched and cited no court cases that support the analysis.
Points Range:12.95 (3.5%) – 14.76 (3.99%)
Researched and cited one or two (1 or 2) court cases that support the analysis.
Points Range:14.8 (4%) – 16.61 (4.49%)
Researched and cited three (3) court cases that support the analysis.
Points Range:16.65 (4.5%) – 18.5 (5%)
Researched and cited at least four (4) court cases that support the analysis.
Name:PAD525 Week 7 Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights
Description:PAD525 Week 7 Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights
Tags: 1500 Words Assessment Brief, Create a 4–6 page, Discussion Assignment, Do My Assignment for Me Online - Write Academic Papers, For this assignment you will write a paper, Help write a word paper, Need expert to write a word essay, Online Homework Help: Do My Online Class Assignment, Presentation AssignmentEvery student wants the best grades and that’s our Focus
Our team consists of outstanding writers who have specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and professionals experienced in academic research writing. They hold at least a graduate degree—230 with Masters and MSN qualifications, experts carefully selected and trained to ensure the best quality of our work. .
We’re dedicated to bringing on board top-notch writers who can provide excellent work at prices that make sense for college students; affordable papers. Our goal? To give you the best bang for your buck without ever compromising on the quality of our essay writing services—or the content of your paper. #Don’t forget to use the DISCOUNT code in the COUPONS section of the order form before you pay!.
The service guarantees that our final work is 100% original, rearched and human written expertly. We are committed to delivering plagiarism-free and AI-free work to each university/college student's 'write my paper' request. To uphold this promise, we check every draft for any possible instances of duplication, wrong citation, grammar errors and artificiality before we send it to you. Thus, you can always rely on us to write genuine and high-standard content for your essay assignments.
When you trust to place an order with Homework Ace Tutors, here is what happens: