Posted: January 13th, 2021

Dangerous Offender

The paper should be six pages. A title page, four pages of response and a reference page. Please keep you response to four full pages. You must defend one the following positions using research that you have found from credible sources. The topic relates to the “Dangerous Offender” designation in this country POSITION ONE Canada currently overuses this designation as an informal method of social control over disadvantaged populations in our country. POSITION TWO Canada should use this designation more often. Violent criminals are being released from prisons and they are re-offending putting innocent citizens at risk. I feel like position two is easier to write about, but you can choose depending on which one you find more references on. No min or max # of references so use what you think is appropriate (one for each argument you have). more about what this designation is and how it typically works- This information should be summarized in one paragraph.Please provide a strong basis for your argument as this is not an opinion paper.
—
A Dangerous Offender is a legal designation in Canada that applies to individuals who have been convicted of a serious personal injury offense and who are deemed to be a significant risk to public safety. The Dangerous Offender designation allows for an indefinite period of detention for the offender, typically in a federal prison, and may also involve the imposition of special conditions upon release.

To be designated as a Dangerous Offender, an individual must first be convicted of a serious personal injury offense, which is defined as an offense that carries a maximum sentence of at least 10 years imprisonment and involves either a weapon, sexual assault, or serious bodily harm. The offender must also be found to be a significant risk to public safety, either because of their past criminal behavior or because of their likelihood of committing further offenses in the future.

The Dangerous Offender designation is considered a severe punishment and is reserved for the most serious offenders. It is typically used in cases where an offender has a history of violent or sexual offenses and has shown a lack of remorse or a failure to rehabilitate. The designation is intended to protect the public from individuals who pose a high risk of committing further violent offenses.

It is important to note that the Dangerous Offender designation is not intended to be used as a form of social control or as a means of punishing individuals for their circumstances or background. Instead, it is intended to be used as a tool for protecting the public from truly dangerous individuals.
It is important to consider both positions on the use of the “Dangerous Offender” designation in Canada.

POSITION ONE: Some argue that Canada currently overuses this designation as an informal method of social control over disadvantaged populations in our country. This position suggests that the use of the Dangerous Offender designation disproportionately affects marginalized and disadvantaged groups, such as Indigenous peoples and those living in poverty, and is used as a way to exert control over these populations rather than as a means of protecting the public from truly dangerous individuals.

POSITION TWO: Others argue that Canada should use this designation more often in order to protect the public from violent offenders who are being released from prison and are re-offending. This position suggests that it is necessary to take strong action to ensure the safety of innocent citizens, and that the Dangerous Offender designation is an important tool for preventing further harm from being inflicted by violent criminals.

Ultimately, the appropriate use of the Dangerous Offender designation will depend on a careful consideration of both positions and the need to strike a balance between protecting the public and ensuring that the designation is not used disproportionately or unfairly. It is important to carefully assess the risk posed by individual offenders and to consider the potential consequences of using this designation, including the impact on marginalized and disadvantaged populations.