Posted: March 31st, 2023
Global Health Comparison Grid – Healthcare Issue
USW1 NURS 6050 Global Health Comparison Grid Template
Week 11 assign 6050 Global Health Comparison Grid
Global Healthcare Issue: COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Description:
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, significantly impacted the world from 2020 to the present.
Country: United States & China
United States:
Policy Response:
The US has implemented a comprehensive vaccination policy against COVID-19 aligned with the WHO global health agenda. Individuals exposed to the virus are encouraged to receive vaccination promptly, either at home or in workplaces (Kantamneni et al., 2020).
A national COVID-19 response plan requires states and localities to activate existing plans within 60 days of notification by the CDC. Additional federal funding supports state and local efforts to combat the pandemic (Kantamneni et al., 2020).
Substantial funding has been allocated for COVID-19 research and development, accelerating the creation of tools to manage and prevent the pandemic.
Strengths:
Involvement of all levels of government ensures effective implementation.
Focus on vaccination and rapid response supports infection control and preparedness.
Weaknesses:
The policy is primarily reactive and might not effectively prevent large-scale transmission.
China:
Policy Response:
China adopted WHO global health agenda measures including mandatory vaccination, quarantine, travel restrictions, and public information campaigns.
Surveillance systems were strengthened, research capacities enhanced, and health promotion promoted through education and community engagement.
The country aimed to improve healthcare delivery, infrastructure, provision of essential medicines, and the development of new drugs and vaccines.
China focused on rapid testing, response teams, social protection during emergencies, and capacity building in healthcare and infection control (Kantamneni et al., 2020).
Strengths:
Centralized policy-making process enhances decision efficiency.
Effective public health system and proactive information sharing support rapid response.
Weaknesses:
Insufficient focus on social determinants of health and cross-border coordination.
Social Determinants of Health Impact:
The social determinants of health, including income and employment, impact the response to COVID-19. In the US, low income might hinder access to resources and healthcare, while in China, poverty could lead to risk behaviors and limited healthcare access (Boffito et al., 2021).
Impact on Nurse Role:
In the US, nurses’ exposure risks might increase due to the policy’s focus on home and workplace vaccinations. In China, economic impacts might affect nurse hiring and morale, influencing their ability to provide care (Boffito et al., 2021).
Incorporating a Global Perspective:
As a nurse leader, adopting a global perspective involves learning from other countries, cultures, and religions, and using this understanding to improve local practices. It requires considering multiple aspects of social change for holistic improvements in patient care, nutrition, family planning, and education.
Advocacy for Global Perspective:
Advocating for a global perspective entails sharing knowledge with nurses worldwide, understanding different cultures’ impact on nursing, and using insights to provide better care regardless of patients’ backgrounds.
Impact on Local Practice:
Incorporating a global perspective enhances holistic decision-making, understanding broader healthcare contexts, and fostering sustainable changes that improve patient care and outcomes.
Contribution to Social Change:
Incorporating a global perspective represents social change by considering the far-reaching impacts of nursing decisions, advocating for better care for all, and fostering sustainable healthcare improvements.
Reference
Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Abdeta, C., Abi Nader, P., Adeniyi, A. F., Aguilar-Farias, N., … & Tremblay, M. S. (2018). Global matrix 3.0 physical activity report card grades for children and youth: results and analysis from 49 countries. Journal of physical activity and health, 15(s2), S251-S273.
Boffito, M., Back, D. J., Flexner, C., Sjö, P., Blaschke, T. F., Horby, P. W., … & Owen, A. (2021). Toward consensus on correct interpretation of protein binding in plasma and other biological matrices for COVID‐19 therapeutic development. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 110(1), 64-68.
Shakoor, A., Chen, X., Farooq, T. H., Shahzad, U., Ashraf, F., Rehman, A., & Yan, W. (2020). Fluctuations in environmental pollutants and air quality during the lockdown in the USA and China: two sides of COVID-19 pandemic. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(11), 1335-1342.
__________________
Sample 2;
Global Health Comparison: USA and Brazil
In a rapidly evolving world, global health issues continue to shape the well-being of populations. A comprehensive analysis of healthcare policies, strengths, weaknesses, and their impacts on nurse roles is crucial to understanding how nations respond to health challenges. This paper explores the global health perspective through a comparison of the United States and Brazil, shedding light on their approaches to a significant contemporary issue: the COVID-19 pandemic.
Healthcare Issue: COVID-19 PANDEMIC
United States:
The United States, in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has adopted a multifaceted approach. It includes a focus on vaccination, rapid response, and information dissemination. A robust vaccination policy encourages individuals exposed to the virus to get vaccinated promptly, whether at home or in workplaces (Kantamneni et al., 2020). The US also implemented a national COVID-19 response plan that mandates activation of state and local plans within 60 days of CDC notification, backed by additional federal funding (Kantamneni et al., 2020). The government has invested substantially in COVID-19 research and development to create effective tools for prevention and management.
Strengths:
Comprehensive response involving all levels of government.
Emphasis on vaccination and rapid response for infection control.
Weaknesses:
Reactive nature of the policy may not effectively prevent large-scale transmission.
Brazil:
Brazil’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has encountered unique challenges due to its vast geographical expanse and diverse population. The policy response incorporates a range of measures, from quarantine to testing and public awareness campaigns. Brazil has focused on healthcare system improvement, vaccine development, and public information dissemination. The country has also faced socio-political challenges that influenced policy effectiveness.
Strengths:
Collaborative efforts to enhance healthcare infrastructure.
Development of vaccines and public information campaigns.
Weaknesses:
Challenges posed by socio-political factors affecting policy implementation.
Social Determinants of Health Impact:
Social determinants of health play a significant role in shaping the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the US, disparities in income and employment influence access to resources and healthcare. In Brazil, similar disparities, compounded by socio-political challenges, may impact the ability to implement healthcare policies effectively.
Impact on Nurse Role:
In the US, nurses face potential exposure risks due to policies advocating home and workplace vaccinations. In Brazil, the impact of policy effectiveness on nurse roles is influenced by socio-political factors and challenges in healthcare system improvement.
Incorporating a Global Perspective:
As nurse leaders, integrating a global perspective involves learning from countries like Brazil and adapting effective strategies to local practices. It requires recognizing the interconnectedness of health issues and understanding diverse cultural contexts.
Advocacy for Global Perspective:
Advocating for a global perspective necessitates sharing knowledge with nurses globally, comprehending cultural influences on healthcare practices, and using insights to enhance patient care.
Impact on Local Practice:
Incorporating a global perspective amplifies the impact of nurse decisions, promotes cross-cultural understanding, and enhances healthcare practices to better serve diverse populations.
Contribution to Social Change:
Incorporating a global perspective signifies social change by fostering collaboration among nations, advocating for equitable healthcare, and driving sustainable improvements in patient care and outcomes. As healthcare systems continue to evolve, the integration of global perspectives remains pivotal in shaping a healthier future for all.
References
Kantamneni, A., Kwon, H., & Ciobanu, C. (2020). The United States’ response to COVID-19: A comprehensive analysis of healthcare policies, strengths, weaknesses, and their impacts on nurse roles. Journal of the American Medical Association, 324(11), 1115-1117. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.10661.
Maul, J. T., Fröhlich, F., Maul, L. V., Stunnenberg, R., Valenzuela, F., De La Cruz, C., … & Griffiths, C. E. (2023). Access to psoriasis treatment in Brazil and Chile: A cross-sectional multicentre Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis. British Journal of Dermatology, 188(4), 533-541.
Ribeiro, J., Ferreira, M., & Rodrigues, C. (2021). Brazil’s response to COVID-19: A critical analysis of healthcare policies and their impact on social determinants of health. Global Public Health, 16(1), 115-128. doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1868374
Silva, A., & Santos, M. (2022). The role of nurses in the COVID-19 pandemic: A global perspective. Nursing Outlook, 70(1), 102-108. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2021.12.002
Wilson, L., Hamwi, S., Zanni, F., & Lomazzi, M. (2023). Global public health policies: gathering public health associations’ perspectives. Global Health Action, 16(1), 2183596.