Executive Summary
The strategic location of the South Face Mine, owned by Mountain Mining Canada Ltd (MMCL), catches the attention of Can-Do to make an offer for purchasing the mine. If our company successfully acquires it, the combination of better surface logistics and optimal location of new drift mines could provide an annual cost saving of up to $1.5 million for 20 years. However, MMCL has closed the mine and currently been spending on closure and reclamation of it; undoubtedly MMCL would like to transfer those costs to us.
Given the data in the MMCL management budget with removal of costs which are not transferred to Can-Do or can be internalized , and assuming a 6% interest rate for discounting, the 15% contingency allowance used in MMCL implies an inflation rate of 2.55%.
Having studied various assumptions, the sensitivity tests indicate the variance of short-term duration is the most important risk underlying as a 1-year extension of short-term costs reduces the value of acquisition by $6.6 million from $15.5 million to $8.9 million (58% of original value). A 2-year extension further reduces the value by 6.4 million to $2.5 million (16% of original value).
The recommended walk-away point would be $14 million, a value lower than the net values of acquisition calculated in most sensitivity tests excluding those with respect to short-term duration and estimated cost saving. It also means that an efficient cost control should be performed to avoid an extension of short-term cost and a failure to realize the estimated cost saving.
It is also worth noting that there are large discrepancies of cost items between the 2006 and 2005 budgets. A detailed review on financial data is suggested so as to find out any hidden problems or risks.
What’s Your Refund Policy?
If your paper doesn’t meet your instructions, we offer a money-back guarantee. Contact support within 7 days, and we’ll review your case promptly to ensure fairness and satisfaction.
Introduction
The purchase of the South Face Mine, currently owned by Mountain Mining Canada Limited (MMCL), can provide Can-Do a very large reduction in operating cost of North Fork Mine, located adjacent to South Face Mine, by an estimated amount up to $1.5 million annually for the next 20 years, attributed to the optimal location of new drift mines and the improved logistics.
However, it is expected that MMCL would require us to bear the closure and reclamation costs. Therefore, the net value of the acquisition is the value of cost saving net of the value of those additional costs.
By considering the data provided and computing the net value of acquisition, it comes up with the walk-away point, which is critical and crucial to our negotiation with MMCL. The remaining parts of this memorandum explain the determination of the walk-away point. In particular, the purpose of this study is to:
Data
Source of Data
MMCL has provided the 2005 and 2006 management budgets for the closure and reclamation costs of South Face Mine. The following table summarizes the cost projected from 2006 onwards:
Item
06 Budget ($’000)
05 Budget ($’000)
Diff. ($’000)
Diff. (in %)
Direct Cost
6.0) Water Treatment
How Do You Ensure Paper Quality?
Every paper goes through a rigorous quality check—grammar, structure, and originality are verified by editors using advanced tools, ensuring it meets your professor’s standards.
114.15%
9.0) Tailing Storage Facility Reclamation
Can I Track My Order’s Progress?
Yes! Log into your account to check real-time updates, view drafts, and communicate with your writer to stay in the loop throughout the process.
66.67%
11.0) Facilities Demolition
Can You Write in Different Academic Tones?
Our writers adapt to any tone—analytical, persuasive, or descriptive—matching your assignment’s requirements and your professor’s expectations perfectly.
22.47%
What Types of Papers Do You Handle?
From essays to dissertations, case studies to lab reports, we cover all academic papers across disciplines, customized to your specific needs.
12.0) Facilities/Equipment Disposition and/or Salvage
-37.27%
13.0) Inventory Disposition
-4.36%
14.0) Post Closure Monitoring Costs
312.03%
Total Direct Cost
3,052
(613)
3,664
-598.21%
Indirect Cost
15.0) Socio-Economic Costs
Can You Help with Presentations?
Sure thing! We create compelling slides and scripts for presentations, designed to engage your audience and meet academic standards.
25.81%
16.0) Consultant Services
How Do You Handle Sensitive Topics?
We approach sensitive topics with care, ensuring confidentiality and respectful handling, with writers trained to maintain academic integrity.
72.22%
18.0) Owners Management (post closure)
Can I Request a Draft Before Completion?
Yes, you can request a partial draft to review progress and provide feedback, ensuring the final paper aligns with your vision.
154.69%
What’s Your Customer Support Like?
Our 24/7 support team is available via chat, email, or phone to answer questions, resolve issues, and guide you through the process.
22.0) Bonding Cost
200.00%
Are There Any Hidden Fees?
No surprises here! Our pricing is transparent—your quote includes all services, with optional add-ons clearly listed before you confirm.
23.0) Contracts/Commitments/Royalties
77.30%
24.0) Taxes (Land, Buildings etc…)
-43.75%
30.0) Contingency*
72.40%
Total Indirect Cost
29,943
23,941
6,002
25.07%
Total Cost
32,994
23,329
9,666
41.43%
* Note: The value items above do not reflect any time value; instead the indirect cost “Contingency” implicitly bears it.
Table 1: Management Budget of Closure/Reclamation Plan Cost from 2006 onwards
There are different types of costs, including short-term costs which will be incurred within five years and long-term costs which will be incurred during the whole reclamation period. There are also salvage values of equipments remaining on site (i.e. Inventory Disposition), and they will accrue to Can-Do. Moreover, MMCL has included a 15% contingency allowance in its calculation.
From the table above, it is clearly observed that large discrepancies exist for most cost items between 2006 and 2005 budget, and this indicates a deficiency of the contingency allowance in 2005 to cover the adverse development of costs estimated from 2005 to 2006. It concerns us about the accuracy and reliability of the predictions. It is suggested a detailed review of financial data as well as other information related to the situation of the mine be conducted in order to discover any potential problems which may put our company at risk.
Data Adjustment
The data provided is subject to adjustments so as to calculate a more reasonable walk-away point. They include:
Removing costs not to be transferred from MMCL to Can-Do (e.g. severance costs)
Removing costs which could be realized from internalizing them in Can-Do (e.g. inspection costs)
Item
Modified 06 Budget ($’000)
Direct Cost
6.0) Water Treatment
9.0) Tailing Storage Facility Reclamation
11.0) Facilities Demolition
12.0) Facilities/Equipment Disposition and/or Salvage
13.0) Inventory Disposition
14.0) Post Closure Monitoring Costs
Total Direct Cost
2,985
Indirect Cost
15.0) Socio-Economic Costs
–
16.0) Consultant Services
18.0) Owners Management (post closure)
22.0) Bonding Cost
23.0) Contracts/Commitments/Royalties
–
24.0) Taxes (Land, Buildings etc…)
30.0) Contingency*
Total Indirect Cost
7,040
Total Cost
10,024
Table 2: Modified and Original Budget from 2006 onwards
Analysis: Methods & Assumptions
Contingency Allowance & Inflation Rate
MMCL has included a 15% contingency allowance in its budget while has not considered the time value of cost items. Assuming the allowance is totally for the inflation, the implied inflation rate that is equivalent to the 15% contingency allowance is found to be 2.55% (using the Excel function “goal seek”), after the data adjustment aforementioned.
Sensitivity Tests, Risks & Walk-away Point
To investigate the risks underlying, sensitivity tests have been performed to examine the uncertainties associated with the assumptions of cash flow projections (all with 0% contingency allowance). The table below summarizes the results:
2.55%
2.55%
2.55%
2.55%
3.00%
6%
3.00%
3.00%
3.00%
4.00%
6%
3.00%
3.00%
3.00%
3.00%
* The inflation rate of 2.55% used in the Scenario Base and #1-3 comes from the derivation mentioned in the previous part.
Table 3: Sensitivity Tests
The table consists of the net value of the acquisition under different combinations of short-term duration, long-term duration, inflation rate and discount rate (Scenario Base and #1-10). From the table, it shows that under most scenarios the value of acquisition is around $14-15 million. Therefore, it would be appropriate and conservative to set $14 million as the walk-away point.
In addition, an extra sensitivity test on estimated cost saving are conducted (Scenario #11-12). When compared to Scenario #4, it demonstrates that a 10% decrease in cost saving causes the value of acquisition below $14 million. It implies a strong control is needed to monitor that the realized cost saving is close to the estimated one.
As shown in the tables, the short-term duration should be the key risk factor as an increase in it leads to a tremendous decrease in value (by comparing Scenario Base to Scenario #1-2 or Scenario #4 to Scenario #5-6). Can-Do should therefore pay much attention to the extension of short-term cost projections.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based upon the modified cost budget and assuming a 6% discount rate, a 15% contingency allowance implies an inflation rate of 2.55%. Also, after a study of various assumptions by sensitivity tests, a walk-away point of $14 million will be sufficient for the acquisition of South Face Mine. However, a few issues have to be highlighted:
The implied inflation rate of 2.55% is less than the lower bound of inflation rate projected by our economists.
The determination of walk-away point is based on the assumption that $1.5 million can be saved annually over 20 years. A slight decrease in it can be enough to cause an overall loss for the acquisition provided that the final purchase price of South Face Mine is close to the walk-away point.
For some costs including water treatment operation/maintenance costs and salaries of accountant/environmental person, they may be internalized to a certain extent; yet they are not removed for the determination of walk-away point due to their specialty. This also provides a relatively conservative walk-away point implicitly.
It is recommended that a detailed investigation should be carried out to verify the estimated costs in the budget as well as to locate any other problems. It is also proposed that an efficient cost control should be established in order to keep the cost be aligned with the prediction if Can-Do successfully purchases the South Face Mine from MMCL.
Appendix: Data Adjustment
Some closure and reclamation costs are removed from the MMCL budget of South Face Mine from 2006 onwards since they can be either removed (not transferred to Can-Do) or internalized. The following table summarizes the data adjustment done:
9.0) Tailing Storage Facility Reclamation
15.0) Socio-Economic Costs
18.0) Owners Management (post closure)
18.0) Owners Management (post closure)
23.0) Contracts/Commitments/Royalties
Order | Check Discount
Tags:
Affordable College Homework,
APA Citation Assignment Help Assignment Writers Australia for College Students,
Custom Essay Writing,
Online Homework Help,
PhD Dissertation Help,
Research Essay Support
Sample Essays, Assignments & Research Topics Ideas