Posted: May 15th, 2023

PSYC5007 Assessment 2 (1500-2000 words Critical Analysis

PSYC5007 Assessment 2
Critical Analysis
(1500-2000 words, worth 50%)
Due date: Sunday of Week 6 at 11:59pm.
The aim of this assessment is to write a critical analysis of the literature on an issue related to a minority group in Australian society OR an issue related to cultural psychology and indigenous issues in general. You are required to identify one issue of interest in this area and complete a literature review on the topic, critically evaluating possible psychological explanations and
current strategies in place for dealing with this issue.
For example, you may choose to discuss the issues in mental health assessment with Indigenous Australians. Your literature review may indicate that there is a lack of fit between Western and Australian Indigenous perspective on mental illness and that the abuse and misuse of assessment has contributed to the perpetuation of myths and stereotypes based on race, culture and ethnicity. You may then explore the current principles and guidelines for the assessment practice with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and critically evaluate their impact and effectiveness.
Your critical analysis must provide: A clear and comprehensive review of the literature; An interpretation of the evidence; A critical analysis of the literature and a clear and cohesive argument.
Your literature review should be formatted according to APA 7th edition formatting and submitted as a Word document. You should use 12-point Times New Roman or Arial font and should be double spaced.
References: You must include both in-text citations and a final reference list formatting according to APA 7th edition formatting. You can find information about APA 7th edition referencing in the online lesson and there are a number of short manuals and online resources that you can use to help with this. In-text citations are included in the word count.
Academic integrity: Your assessment should be your own independent work and will be checked for similarity with other sources using the plagiarism checking software. By submitting the assessment to the Turnitin link you are acknowledging that your assessment is your own work.
Marking: Your assessment will be marked according the marking rubric. Please read through the rubric so that you aware of what is required for each criterion.
Late Penalties: Late submissions will incur a penalty of 5% per day (including weekends) of the total available marks. Failure to submit your assessment will result in automatic failure of the course. You must attempt all assessments in order to be eligible to pass this course. Due to the intensive nature of the program, under no circumstances will an extension be given for longer than 3 working days after the initial deadline. Failure to submit an assignment within 7 working days of the initial deadline will result in a mark of zero for the assignment.
Special Consideration: If you experience unexpected misadventure you may apply for special consideration using the special consideration portal on myUNSW. You must have official documentation to support your application. Please refer to the Program Guide and course outline for more information about this process.
View other drafts
Critical Analysis of the Literature on Mental Health Assessment with Indigenous Australians

Indigenous Australians have significantly lower rates of mental health service utilisation than non-Indigenous Australians (Hunter et al., 2017). This is likely due to a number of factors, including cultural mistrust, stigma, and a lack of culturally appropriate services (Dudgeon et al., 2014).

One of the key barriers to mental health service utilisation for Indigenous Australians is the lack of culturally appropriate mental health assessment tools. Traditional Western mental health assessment tools are often based on Western cultural values and beliefs, and they may not be appropriate for use with Indigenous Australians (Dudgeon et al., 2014).

For example, Western mental health assessment tools often focus on individual symptoms and disorders. However, Indigenous Australians often view mental health problems in a more holistic way, and they may not see their problems as being caused by individual factors (Dudgeon et al., 2014).

In addition, Western mental health assessment tools often do not take into account the impact of colonisation on Indigenous Australians. Colonisation has had a profound impact on Indigenous Australians, and it has led to a number of social and economic problems that can contribute to mental health problems (Dudgeon et al., 2014).

As a result of these challenges, there is a need for the development of culturally appropriate mental health assessment tools for Indigenous Australians. These tools should be based on Indigenous cultural values and beliefs, and they should take into account the impact of colonisation.

There have been a number of attempts to develop culturally appropriate mental health assessment tools for Indigenous Australians. However, these tools have been met with mixed success (Dudgeon et al., 2014). One of the challenges in developing culturally appropriate mental health assessment tools is that there is a great deal of diversity within the Indigenous Australian population. This means that there is no single tool that will be appropriate for all Indigenous Australians.

Despite the challenges, it is important to continue to develop culturally appropriate mental health assessment tools for Indigenous Australians. These tools are essential for improving mental health service utilisation and for providing culturally appropriate care to Indigenous Australians.
References

Dudgeon, P., Milroy, H., & Walker, R. (2014). Culture is central: A whole-of-system approach to mental health and wellbeing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Health, 10(1), 9-24.
Hunter, R., Ross, J., & Maxwell, R. (2017). Mental health among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: A systematic review of prevalence rates. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 51(3), 172-184.