Posted: October 31st, 2023
HCM4003 Communication and Interprofessional CollaborationReport
HCM4003 Communication and Interprofessional Collaboration Report Date for Submission: Please refer to the timetable on ilearn (The submission portal on ilearn will close at 14:00 UK time on the date of submission) Page 2 of 7 [2330] Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions. Assignment Brief As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a Analysis of Communication Report assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments. Learning Outcomes: After completing the module, you should be able to: 1. Evaluate and apply appropriate communication skills with team members, patients and other stakeholders involved in person-centred care. 2. Appraise the different types of communication and their impact on the professional work environment during multi-disciplinary teamworking. 3. Discuss conflict management frameworks and their use in resolving issues that arise during team negotiations. 4. Recognise the value of shared leadership skills and team spirit when collaborating with others during interprofessional working. 5. Graduate Attribute: Professional Skills Perform effectively within the professional environment. Work within a team, demonstrating interpersonal skills such as effective listening, negotiating, persuading and presentation. Be flexible and adaptable to changes within the professional environment Page 3 of 7 [2330] Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions. Guidance Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in AU Harvard system. You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work. You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number. Maximum word count: 2000 words Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework Please note the following: Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment. The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in text citations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables, figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. ALL other printed words ARE included in the word count. Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a 10-percentage point deduction. Page 4 of 7 [2330] Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions. Assignment Task Video/ Case study Analysis Report: From the list provided, select one short documentary and analyse the communication and collaboration involved and the importance of interprofessional collaboration and cooperation in tackling the discussed issue. Each video demonstrates one or more major concepts discussed in this module. You must link as many concepts from the lessons as possible to scenes from the video that is chosen. (2000 words) (100 marks) (LOs: 1,2,3,4, & 5) End of questions Page 5 of 7 [2330] Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions. Formative Feedback You have the opportunity to submit a draft to receive formative feedback. The feedback is designed to help you develop areas of your work and it helps you develop your skills as an independent learner. If you are a distance learning student, you should submit your work, by email, to your tutor, no later than 2 weeks before the actual submission deadline. If you are a blended learning student, your tutor will give you a deadline for formative feedback and further details. Formative feedback will not be given to work submitted after the above date or the date specified by your tutor - if a blended learning student. Referencing Guidance You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the AU Harvard system. Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Arden Library Submission Guidance Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0% fail. Your assessment can be submitted as a single Word (MS Word) or PDF file, or as multiple files. If you chose to submit multiple files, you must name each document as the question/part you are answering along with your student number ie Q1 Section A STUXXXX. If you wish to overwrite your submission or one of your submissions, you must ensure that your new submission is named exactly the same as the previous in order for the system to overwrite it. You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available on the A-Z key information on iLearn.) Page 6 of 7 [2330] Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions. Assessment Criteria (Learning objectives covered - all) Level 4 is the first stage on the student journey into undergraduate study. At Level 4 students will be developing their knowledge and understanding of the discipline and will be expected to demonstrate some of those skills and competences. Students are expected to express their ideas clearly and to structure and develop academic arguments in their work. Students will begin to apply the theory which underpins the subject and will start to explore how this relates to other areas of their learning and any ethical considerations as appropriate. Students will begin to develop self-awareness of their own academic and professional development. Grade Mark Bands Generic Assessment Criteria First (1) 80%+ Outstanding performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject area and to confidently apply theory whilst showing awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows an outstanding level of competence and confidence in managing appropriate sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows originality of thought. 70- 79% Excellent performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply theory whilst showing some awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows a high level of competence in managing sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows originality of thought. Upper second (2:1) 60- 69% Very good performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply some theory. The work shows a very good level of competence in managing sources and materials and some initiative. Academic writing skills are very good and expression remains accurate overall. Very good professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows some original thought. Lower second (2:2) 50- 59% A good performance which begins to analyse the subject and apply some underpinning theory. The work shows a sound level of competence in managing basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are good and Expression remains accurate overall although the piece may lack structure. Good professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks some original thought. Third (3) 40- 49% Satisfactory level of performance in which there are some omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows a satisfactory use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are limited and there are some errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are some difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative. Page 7 of 7 [2330] Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions. Marginal Fail 30- 39% Limited performance in which there are omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are weak and there are errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative. 29% and below A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding, underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows little evidence in the use of appropriate sources and materials. Academic writing skills are very weak and there are numerous errors in expression. From YouTube 4. https:I/www.youtube.com/watch?,-7bsioBAsCDk&list=PLKX-YBD4n1PfPAX1PIqEeuna9vLw4pu-t&index=2&t=59s 5. https://www youtube.com/watch?v=7bsioBAsCDk&list=PLKX-YBD4n1PfPAX1PTqEeuna9vLw4ou-t&index=2&t=106s From Netflix 6. https://www.youtube.corntwatch?v=kRrYo9pG PY&Iist=PLvahciwMqN4MOGRkZY8WkLZMb 6Z-W7abLA 7. httos:/Neww.youtube.comlwatch?v=AynwysiihuCl&list=PLvahciwMqN4MOGRkZY8WkLZMb6 Z-VV7abLA&Index=2 8. https://mwi.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa4x84xUdoci&list=PLvahawMqN4MOGRIcZY8WkLZMb6 Z-W7abLMinde x=3
Can I Request a Specific Writer?
Yes, if you have worked with a writer before, you can request them again for consistency and familiarity with your needs. This ensures a smooth, tailored experience. Writer continuity helps maintain consistent style and understanding of your preferences. Browse profiles or contact support to make your choice. Essay writer relationships build over time for increasingly personalized academic support.
Order | Check Discount
Tags: write my essay no plagiarism, write my essay for me by native writer, thesis examples, research paper samples
